Chinese Bank to Buy Stake in U.S. Arm of Bank of East Asia

Does this bother you and why has not the mainstream media picked up this?  Okay.  I am not xenophobic but I am a patriot and a diehard capitalist.  Having established that (for those of you who do not know me very well) I must confess I am a bit perplexed about the Federal Reserve’s recent decision to allow The Industrial and Commercial Bank of China to purchase 80% of the Bank of East Asia.  The only press I have seen to date has been from the NY Times and the Wall Street Journal.  I will keep looking.

This is a watershed moment as it is the first time a Chinese institution would have a controlling stake in a United States financial institution (as reported today in the NY Times and the Wall Street Journal).  I mean, I am fan of the Fed on the general principle that someone needs to manage the money supply and supervise the banking system.  But when they are overseeing the domestic banks there are a multitude of regulatory guidelines and laws that actually make the domestic banks pay attention (okay – the 2008 Crisis still happened, but..).  However, how is the Fed going to get the Chinese banks to heel to their will.  After this transaction, the playground gets a little muddled and I am afraid no one is paying attention.

The Chinese government owns 65% of The Industrial and Commercial Bank of China.  Let that number sink in.  Who is going to have the most influence over the bank: the Fed or the People’s Republic of China?  If the question is too difficult for you then you need to brush up on comparative politics (Hint: The Communist government controls the actions of the bank when it comes to a pinch).  This will be a problem.  What is next – sale of one of our major shipyards to the Chinese?

Our banking system still has not recovered from the 2008-09 crises with earnings well below where they need to be for every bank to be healthy and growth anemic at the majority of the banks (JPM and GS notwithstanding).  The additional competition from the Chinese banks will apply more pressure (not at first according to the WSJ) overtime and the action will be fierce as the Chinese government will want a decent return on their investment (don’t we all?).  The FED can be satisfied that concerns about capitalization are non-existent since the Chinese treasury is awash with U.S. Dollars.  It must be appealing to the FED to have additional liquidity strength in our market but what if the Chinese decide, say in 10 or 5 years they do not want to play by the FED’s rules.  What does the FED (We) do?  Control of our own currency may be in the hands of the socialist (there I said it) Chinese government.

Let me know what you think.

Investment Themes for Client Portfolios

These general themes will persist in our investable markets for the next 3-5 years. Some of these will be persistent whereas some will be transient from time to time. Overall, these will have
direct bearing on portfolio performance going forward.

Asset Allocation and risk:

We are still in a secular Bear Market and have been since July 2000 and this threatens to be one of the longest in history. The average bear market has been 9.5 years with the longest in excess of 16 years. Our current secular Bear market may be ending but the volatility we have endured for the past 9-12 months still gives one pause on the investment direction to take.

I am taking a wait and see point of view and I favor high quality dividend paying stocks with a good exposure to companies with demonstrated growth of earnings, market share, and produce
products and services we will need to live our lives.

Here are the trends I am following and acting upon as I invest client assets.

Ø Equity markets both domestic and international are in a secular Bear market and could remain
so for the next 3-5 years but potential exists in equity even after a significant recovery from the March 2009 bottom.
o
Expected annual returns for the period will be below historical average (9.5%) with elevated volatility
o
Interest rates will be low for the next three years but eventually will rise as inflation increases
o
Economic Growth will remain anemic (< 3%) combined with unemployment rate above the
historical average (4-6%). Unemployment will likely remain above 7% for the next two – three years.
o
Fixed income bubble – low rates will eventually translate to a rising rate environment, increasing inflation risk and reinvestment risk.
o
Money will flow from fixed income to equities
o
Equity dividend rate for the S&P 500 will continue to rise (currently about 2%)
o
Expected rate of return for equities for the next five years is between 5-9% per annum, less than the historical rate of 9.5 for the S&P 500 going back to 1926

Ø Infrastructure
Rebuild and improvement – This area has been neglected in nearly every developed nation on the planet. Essentially governments have been maintaining at the lowest level possible. It is now time to pay the piper so to speak.
o
Applies to Domestic and International Markets
o
Transportation
§ Highways
§ Railroad
§ Airports
§ Seaport improvements
o
Water
§ Purification
§ Desalination
§ Pipelines
§ Infrastructure (average age in the USA is extremely
long)
o
Power
§ Nuclear
§ Natural Gas
§ Electricity
Ø Healthcare
for an aging America – The Baby Boomer generation will demand higher level of care to maintain a very active lifestyle and this applies in all developed markets as well. Everything from new drugs to artificial joints to preventive healthcare will be driving forces in this sector.
o
Pharmaceutical companies over healthcare providers
§ Uncertainty of the Affordable Healthcare Act in the future
o
Biotech and artificial instruments (knees, hips, etc.)
o
Research and development of new drugs for old diseases (diabetes, heart disease, and cancer)

Ø National Defense – The drawdown of the U.S. Military will make our (over) reliance on technology even more important. This combined with the aging of our war-fighting equipment will ensure money for national defense will remain high on the priority of any administration or
Congress.
o
Increased technology requirements to compensate for fewer troops
o
Aging military equipment and infrastructure
o
Unstable world in general

Ø Growth of the middle class in Emerging Markets – As much as other nations may dislike the
Western developed nations, these countries want the products we have developed and mannufactured and continue to do so. Agriculture and the ability to make processes and land more efficient will drive this sector.
o
Increased demand for food rich in calories and protein
o
Increased need for arable land and more efficient agricultural methods/fertilizer/water
§ Fertilizer
§ Equipment
§ Research

Ø Increasing demand for energy from all sources – Fossil fuels will be around for the next 100+ years and we as a culture need to get it more efficiently as well as develop alternatives for the future
o
Oil/Gas exploration in domestic areas
§ Gulf of Mexico
§ Oil Sand extraction
§ Pipeline construction and
o
Transport and refinement
§ Rail
§ Sea
§ Pipeline
o
Infrastructure – Has been ignored for far too long

Ø Overall Valuations in Equity markets are still below historical levels – Equity markets are the least expensive we have seen in two generations but volatility remains – These sectors are especially compelling:
o
Financial
o
Manufacturing
o
Consumer

Unfortunate Shooting in Afghanistan

I am a retired infantry soldier and have a good idea that this soldier acted alone because of a mental defect or stress. When and if he is tried for these crimes and found to be guilty he will be punished. However, the trial should be in the US not in theater. I can only imagine if he is tried and convicted there. The local populace would demand to be the executioner. Of course getting him out of country will place the soldiers left behind at grave risk of retribution as a result of the anger that will continue to spawn going forward. I too agree we should leave Afghanistan. Our mission of destroying or breaking up Al Qaeda is as complete as any killing of a multi-headed Hydra can be. The people of Afghanistan do not want us there and no matter how long we are there to train, arm and feed them they will not adopt the principles of democracy because of the culture, let alone thank us for the schools, hospitals, roads, water wells, etc we have built for them. I am just sorry that we have expended great resources from our nation’s youth to little or no avail.

The investment landscape changes, it seems, on a daily basis. New products, improved systems and a constantly changing lexicon; all perpetuated by the industry itself and the media. It is a small wonder that individual investors are unsure of where their money is located and what performance they are to expect. Not to mention the risk they may be subjected to on any given market day.

That is where we come into the picture. By we, I mean investment advisors who are dedicated to guiding the investors who are our clients (but also partners in a way) through the shifting maze of the investment world. Some advisors are very adept at this and others are still learning the rigors of the profession so I caution the investor to seek out the information they need to conduct a thorough due diligence of their advisors since so much could be riding on their selection of an investment professional. The next blog I will discuss factors in selecting an advisor.

GroupThink or Leadership - Which One Works for You?

I guess I am a negatron but that is by design. I have a fairly structured decision making process borne of years in the military where decision making at the lowest levels is encouraged to be free thinking (within the regulations of course). Many people think groupthink is alive and well in the US Military and to some extent, it is especially at the general officer ranks. Nevertheless, groupthink in the military, the government and business leads to undesirable outcomes across the board.

Individuals like Gen McChrystal or Carly Fiorina at HP do not adhere to groupthink. Unfortunately, these individuals are drummed out of an organization. Groupthink fails because equal credence is given to all ideas regardless of form and validity, not a bad concept with a strong capable leader able to ferret out the BS. However, without good leadership the common denominator of these decisions is mediocrity not excellence. When management cannot make a decision and allows the groupthink mentality to flourish failure will ultimately occur. I agree that groupthink in and of itself can be useful and lead to better acceptance of good practice and procedures, but it is better defined and characterized as consensus building whereby all ideas are aired and discussed. But decisions based upon how well they will sell with the company masses only perpetuates low standards and drives folks with higher goals and standards to other venues for work leaving the organization with those that accept mediocrity as the standard.

The Fall of The BP Executive

Well the fall of Tony Hayward of BP is complete. However, did he deserve the punishment meted out to him? His use of the English language notwithstanding ("I just want my life back” which I can understand was spoken in an unguarded moment) and his choice of activities in which to relax (yachting) certainly cast a pall over his departure. However, by all accounts BP did as much as could be expected after the oil incident occurred and we may never know what happened on the Deepwater Horizon oilrig.

So..should he be the scapegoat for the misadventures of BP in the Gulf of Mexico?

It is important and we all forget from time to time that leadership is about getting the best out of people even when they don't to do the things an organization needs to do...and get them to do it because they want and need to do it not because you told them to.

Part of this is taking the hit when it comes (and it will come). I have always believed and acted upon this belief: I am responsible for everything my organization does or does not do. If we succeed, it is because, as a team, we all contributed and the team deserves the credit. If the team fails, then I have failed and should take the first bullet from the corporate gun. Others may fall and should but if they have done my bidding in good faith then I may be the only one to pay the price.

I do not begrudge Mr. Hayward's payment as he departs since 90% was earned through his pension over 28 years in the making. Nevertheless, like everything from the yacht to getting his life back, in total it looks bad.

Financial Advice to Women - Part Two How to Rebuild Credit Rating

As in Part One, this section is about modifying our behavior when it comes to money and understanding how the system works. We must understand that in most cases poor credit resulted in a pattern of spending over a period and as such will probably take as long if not longer to rectify.

Individuals face two common problems: Poor credit rating and no credit rating. Both have their unique issues and solutions. We will start with poor credit rating.

Poor credit ratings can be a result of a myriad if issues most likely from poor spending habits resulting in debt accumulation and failure to pay debts for what ever reason. There are other issues (bankruptcy, payment delinquency, default on loans, etc.) but they are beyond the scope of today’s blog.

Poor spending habits lead to the problems but poor decisions in solving credit dilemmas exacerbate the issues. Many people ignore obligations taking a manageable situation and making it a chaotic condition. Of course we all are going to face extraordinary circumstances in our lives that we cannot plan for (job loss, serious illness, etc.) that may well create a condition where credit rating fall. It is how we deal with these that defines our credit character.

Another problem that many women face is that of no credit rating. A woman is most frequently linked to her spouse/partner’s credit rating and does not have one of her own. Some women (and men) do not have a credit rating because they are new to the workforce or have never used credit out of fear of the system or no need. In many circumstances financial planning has driven couples into situations where both incomes are so linked that neither one of the individuals in a marriage have a clear independent credit rating. Usually the individual with primacy on the account in terms of income and naming have the rating while the other individual lacks a rating if separated from the arrangement through death or divorce.

How can an individual rectify these two problems? In the case of a poor credit rating, get informed – what does a poor credit rating mean to you. You may still be able to get credit but you may have to pay a higher interest rate or more stringent repayment terms. Your debtors wan to work with you - they want you pay off the debt rather you file for bankruptcy. Talk to them before you cross the Rubicon of Bankruptcy.

A first step in fixing a credit rating is to determine how bad it really is. To do so get a copy of your credit report and check the details of what is on the report. You do not want to be surprised. Sources of credit ratings are typically Equifax, Experian, and Transunion. You can get a copy through your bank or buy contacting them directly for a one-time fee. Be cautious that you do not signup for services beyond your needs (credit monitoring, identity theft protection, etc.). Steps to take in the short term to repair credit ratings/ranking s include:
a. Control spending.
b. Pay down debt beyond the minimum payments.
c. Pay bills (all bills) on time.
d. Do not miss payments even if the payments are small
e. Negotiate directly with the debtor for a payment plan. In many cases, they will work with you and will not report the negotiation to the credit bureaus. Other “credit counseling and debt consolidation services will report the activity and the credit rating could suffer even more despite good intentions.
f. Avoid opening new credit cards and rolling over to a lower interest rate that goes up later. This activity can adversely affect your rating instead of helping.
g. As a last resort, use a debt consolidation service. The use of these services can prolong the recovery process since it is sometimes reported to the credit bureaus.
h. Continue to create a savings culture in your life

Many young women (and men) do not have a credit rating since they are new to the work force after any years due to divorce or they are new due to recent college graduation. There is no quick way to build a credit rating but small actions quickly build up a positive rating. You ca first establish credit accounts where you can control what you purchase and monitor. Pay these off each month. This payment schedule has a positive impact on your rating history.

You can purchase a large ticket item (if you need it; not for just building a credit rating) such as household appliance, car (used or old) or furniture. This installment consumer credit is usually unsecured (other than the item being purchased and reflects directly o your “credit worthiness”. When buying a car most people want it to be owned jointly and this is okay but you are not building an independent credit rating, hence the problem if divorce or death occurs. A parent may purchase a car for a child graduating from college but it does nothing for the credit rating. Better to help a child in other ways and let her/him finance the car when thy have a job upon graduation.

If you are married with a job, you can put back money in a separate savings account do this as it is a factor when getting loans independent of your spouse/partner or you are single. Getting credit cards as a separate cardholder also helps build the credit record.

These are just a few of the ideas for building, repairing and restoring your credit worthiness in these and subsequent time. As always, see a licensed financial advisor for detailed planning when you can but remember Rome was not built in a day so time is needed as well as a disciplined approach. Your credit rating is as important as your identity so protect it.